In Defense of Conservatism
By Karen Harper
September 21, 2012
Today I respond to a European woman who commented on my “Attaining Prosperity Without the Government” blog that I had posted on Facebook. One of the issues she voiced was taking Obama’s words out of context, and the other was that we Americans need to take care of the weaker of us (which I happen to totally agree with). The problem here is that Conservatives are largely misunderstood when it comes to this social issue, and, because of that, I must jump to our defense.
Dear Heidi,
Thank you for reading my article and commenting. Your opinion is valued. Yes, I did take Obama's words out of context, but I believe that when his words are heard in context, it only further makes my point. The fact, like you stated, that “this platform. . . has been built up by you and with the help of your government” is evident, but what the government provides are tax dollars coming from working citizens, so it is all the same, as far as who is building this platform we use to succeed. It is the hard-working, tax-paying citizens.
We do share the same belief in the other area you brought up, an area in which Conservatives are so misunderstood, and that is taking care of our “weaker” as you mentioned. You said, “Only by joining our forces together, helping each other and taking care of the weaker, can we truly reach (a) better life.” Of course we should take care of the weaker, but we must not confuse weaker with lower income. You rightly asked, “Can one live in prosperity if the person next to you lives in misery?” Because Conservatives desire personal responsibility and accountability, some think they have no compassion. I honestly do not know one Conservative who wants to deny the “weaker” the necessities in life. The elderly, the infirm, those who cannot care for themselves should and do receive support! No one should live in misery. America’s poor, though, are wealthy to many people around the world. Most of our poor have cars, cell phones, air-conditioning, and cable t.v. *
Our great country is what it is because those ABLE to do for themselves actually DID. But our country is changing, and not for the better. We are becoming a nanny state in which way too many people are expecting the government to pay their way. A large percentage of Americans are now dependent on the government, with record numbers on food stamps and welfare. Our U.S. government is broke and borrowing heavily to pay our bills. We are over $16 trillion in debt. So, lest we Conservatives continue to get a bad rap for not caring about people, let it be known that we just believe that we cannot continue down this path of providing for the wants rather than the needs of American citizens, because we are broke, and there are no longer enough tax-paying folks to pick up the tab.
- http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/07/what-is-poverty
- http://newsroom.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/11/poverty-in-america-if-poor-people-own-luxury-items-are-they-really-poor/ “According to the government’s own survey data, in 2005, the average household defined as poor by the government lived in a house or apartment equipped with air-conditioning and cable TV. The family had a car (a third of the poor have two or more cars). For entertainment, the household had two color televisions, a DVD player, and a VCR,” the Heritage Foundation report reads.
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.” ~Margaret Thatcher (Former and longest-serving Prime Minister, UK)